An ecommerce email sunset policy sets the point at which an inactive subscriber stops receiving regular campaigns, whether they qualify for a final re-engagement attempt, and when email marketing is suppressed.
Do not choose that point from time alone. Look at how many emails the person actually received, whether they clicked or bought, whether tracking is reliable, and how often customers normally need your product. Then write a rule your team can apply and test.
A subscriber who ignored twenty campaigns needs a different decision from someone who received two. Both can have “no clicks in 90 days” on their profile. That does not make them the same audience.
Decide what you are stopping
Start by separating three actions.
| Action | What it means | When it may fit |
|---|---|---|
| Exclude from regular campaigns | The person stays eligible for other permitted marketing, but your campaign audiences leave them out | Evidence of interest has weakened, but a relevant automated message or limited test may still have a job |
| Suppress email marketing | Apply the platform's suppression state to stop email marketing eligibility | The person remains inactive after your defined process, or another suppression reason applies |
| Delete a profile | Remove stored profile data under the applicable process | A separate data-management decision, not a shortcut for audience selection |
In Klaviyo, putting someone in an unengaged segment is not itself suppression. Your campaign exclusions and suppression process must do the work. Klaviyo's list-cleaning guide explains the distinction.
Be precise in the policy. “Remove inactive subscribers” leaves too much room for one person to exclude a segment while another deletes the profiles.
This article focuses on inactivity. Keep existing unsubscribe, complaint and other suppression rules intact. A sunset campaign is not a reason to contact people who cannot receive your marketing.
Check whether inactivity is real
Before calling someone inactive, check the evidence you have.
Did they have a fair chance to respond? Count recent messages received, not just the age of the profile. A signup who never received the promised welcome email has a delivery or setup problem to investigate first.
Are you measuring the right actions? Review clicks, purchases and other relevant activity your account reliably records. Opens alone are a weak basis for a permanent decision. Equally, a missing click does not erase a recent order.
Is tracking working? A sudden drop across most of the list is a reason to inspect reporting and integrations before tagging thousands of people as inactive. Missing data should be treated as unknown, not quietly converted into “no interest.”
Does the product have a long buying cycle? People buying furniture may have less reason to return every month than people buying a consumable. Use that difference when setting the review window. It does not mean every past buyer should receive every sale forever.
Review recent signups and recent buyers separately from older subscribers with repeated unanswered campaigns. Your engagement segments should help make that distinction visible.
Build the policy around four decisions
A useful policy fits on one page. It needs an entry rule, exceptions, an end date and a clear action.
1. Who leaves the regular campaign audience?
Choose a period and a minimum number of received emails together. Add the activity checks you can support, including recent purchases where relevant.
For example, a fictional brand might review subscribers after 180 days with no recorded clicks or purchases and at least twelve received marketing emails. Those numbers are an illustration, not an Emerce benchmark or a universal Klaviyo recommendation.
Before using a rule like that, preview the people it selects. Check new subscribers, recent buyers, people with a preference for fewer emails, and profiles affected by a tracking gap. Write down the reason for any exception.
If your team cannot explain why the selected people belong together, the segment needs more work.
2. Who qualifies for a final attempt?
Not every inactive address needs another email. Decide whether a final message has a reasonable purpose for this audience and whether the account's current sending conditions support it.
If you run a test, keep it limited. Explain what the subscriber will receive if they stay. Make the response and unsubscribe options clear. Do not make a discount the only way to show interest.
The existing win-back strategy guide covers the offer and re-engagement decision. The sunset policy supplies the stop rule: what happens if the person still does not respond?
Do not repeatedly rename the same audience “one last chance.” The phrase starts to lose its administrative authority after the fourth attempt.
3. What ends the sequence?
An automated sunset flow is a sequence triggered by defined customer behavior or entry into a qualifying segment. Once configured, its messages and checks run automatically.
Set its rules before launch. Define which actions remove someone from later messages, how long they have to respond, and what marks them for review at the end. For example, a new qualifying click or purchase may change the decision under your policy. Verify the supported events and filters in your account.
Keep these people out of the routine campaigns you intended to stop. Otherwise, a carefully limited sunset sequence can run alongside six sale reminders. Your policy then exists mainly in the meeting notes.
4. Who applies and verifies suppression?
Give the final step an owner. “The flow handles it” is not enough.
Klaviyo's sunset-flow guide describes a property update that marks profiles as unengaged. That marker does not suppress them. The documented bulk-suppression step acts on current segment members; it does not automatically cover people who join later.
Build a recurring review step around the actual supported process, or separately validate an automation that performs it. Do not assume a live flow or a saved segment makes future suppression automatic.
Before applying the final action, recheck eligibility and any activity since the person was marked. Record what was done and verify the resulting marketing status.
Test the rule before applying it to customers
Use test profiles and a small reviewed sample. The important test is whether the right people stop receiving marketing, not whether the flow diagram looks complete.
Check at least these cases:
- A recent signup with too few received emails stays outside the inactivity rule.
- A recent purchaser is handled according to the written exception.
- Someone with a qualifying response exits the remaining sunset messages.
- Someone who remains inactive reaches the final review step.
- An unsubscribed or otherwise suppressed person does not receive a new sunset email.
- A person marked as unengaged is excluded from regular campaigns while awaiting the final action.
- Someone entering the segment next week is covered by the ongoing process, not missed after today's bulk action.
Test campaign exclusions and automated marketing flows separately. Write down any messages that remain eligible and why. Do not accidentally block necessary order or service communications; verify your platform's treatment of those messages instead of assuming one setting governs every email.
Review the result without congratulating the denominator
Your reported click rate can rise when you remove people who never clicked. That arithmetic does not prove the remaining customers clicked more or that inbox placement improved.
Compare a defined period before and after the change. Review delivered messages, total clicks, orders and revenue where available, along with complaints and unsubscribes. Keep attribution settings and audience changes visible. A large sale or tracking repair can make a simple before-and-after comparison misleading.
Also check whether the policy is working operationally: how many people qualified, how many responded, how many were suppressed, and how many remained in limbo. An unfinished suppression queue is not a healthy audience strategy.
You can use the results to adjust future rules. Do not reverse suppression in bulk just because a campaign calendar has a quiet week. A return to marketing needs a valid, documented route that respects the person's permission and current platform rules.
Start with one rule you can finish
Choose one older, repeatedly contacted group with weak activity evidence. Review the definition, document the exceptions and decide whether a final attempt is appropriate. Assign the person who will finish and verify the suppression step.
The goal is not to make the list as small as possible. It is to stop sending regular campaigns to people who no longer have a useful reason to receive them, while keeping a deliberate route for those who do.
Before changing anything, review your current inactivity and suppression rules. For each one, answer: who qualifies, what makes them leave, when does the process end, and who checks that the final action actually happened?
If those answers are missing, start there. Another campaign will not fill them in.
Source notes: Klaviyo documentation above was checked November 2, 2026. The sample thresholds and suggested review process are Emerce recommendations to validate against the account, not guaranteed outcomes.
Work with me 